Search Results for "Section 14(2) maintainability"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of GST Circulars on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Exempted Supplies. Circulars Clarifying Section 17(2) of CGST Act, 2017 Held Not Ultra Vires as They Merely Interpret Existing Provisions.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged the validity of Circular No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Pending Title Dispute. Availability of Alternate Civil Suit Remedy Renders Writ Petition Under Article 227 Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Blue Heaven Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Lack of Liability Proof. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt as accused was not the drawer of the cheque under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Kisan R. Gate, the Power of Attorney holder of Vaishali Sanjay Jaiswal, challenging the acq...