Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

517 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 517 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Vitiation. Promise to Marry Not Proven as Sole Basis for Sexual Relations Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Jagdish Raghunath Mankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No.256 of 1996 for the offence puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Gang Rape Case Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC. Chemical Analyzer Report Establishing Semen Stains Matching Blood Groups of Accused Provides Crucial Corroboration to Victim's Testimony, and Absence of Injuries Does Not Discredit Prosecution Case.

The present appeal arose from the judgment of conviction dated 29.07.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, convicting the four appellants for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant-accused, Arvindbhai @ Bhadabhai Shanabhai @ Shankarbhai Chauhan, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other on Date of Incident and Medical Report Did Not Support Rape.

The appellant, Chandya Shravan Naik, was convicted by the Trial Court for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside

The appellant, Chandrakant @ Chavhan s/o Deorao Bhujade, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Father in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction Under Sections 376, 354, 323, 506 IPC Set Aside. Incestuous Rape Allegation Fails as Prosecutrix's Evidence is Unreliable and Contradictory, Benefit of Doubt Given to Appellant.

The appellant, Balu Bhausaheb Kothule, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 376, 354, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Voluntary Accompaniment. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Conduct and Delayed FIR Undermine Allegations Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Rajan Kannan Padiyachi, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.159 of 1997 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by two accused, Ashok Barkya Dalvi and Paresh Bhiku Bhandari, against their conviction by the III Additional Sess...