Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Officer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act. Proceedings under Section 7(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prior sanction from competent authority was mandatory and absent.

The petitioner, Sri Sudarshan, a Deputy Superintendent of Police under suspension, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, C. Krishnaiah, was accused no. 2 in a corruption case before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. The court held that mere recovery of tainted money without proof of demand or acceptance does not justify denial of bail under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sri Gokul L N, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime No.5/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Discharge Application for Absconding Accused in Corruption Case. Court Must Consider Discharge on Merits Regardless of Accused's Absence.

The applicant, R. Venkatesan, filed a Criminal Revision Application before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Special Judge, CBI, Grea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Discharge Applications in Corruption Case. Special Judge's Transfer of Case to Chief Judicial Magistrate Under Section 228 CrPC Does Not Bar Magistrate from Entertaining Discharge Applications.

The petitioners, Bharat Tukaram Redkar and others, were accused in separate criminal cases for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Special Case No.2/88, acquitting the respondent-ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kashinath Shiru Ahire, was a maintenance surveyor in the Land Record office at Sindkheda, District Dhule. He was convicted by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in PC Act Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Babulal Pardeshi, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nashik, in Special Case No.11 of 2012 for offences under Sections 7, 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Tukaram Parshuram Mane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadhinglaj for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...