Search Results for "Pecuniary Advantage"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Pecuniary Advantage"

294 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Discharge of Hospital Directors and Doctors in PM-JAY Fraud Case — No Prima Facie Case of Criminal Conspiracy Established. Court holds that mere association with a hospital or professional negligence does not constitute criminal conspiracy under Sections 318(4), 319, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B IPC and Section 66D of Information Technology Act, 2000, in absence of specific evidence of meeting of minds.

5 Mar 2026

The present group of revision applications arises from a common order passed by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, rejecting the ap...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctor in Corruption Case — No Prima Facie Case for Criminal Conspiracy or Cheating Established. Inspection Team Member's Role in Verifying Medical College Infrastructure Does Not Attract Offences Under IPC or Prevention of Corruption Act Without Evidence of Mens Rea or Pecuniary Advantage.

30 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Dr. R. Balajinathan, was arrayed as A4 in FIR No.1 of 2022 registered by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CBI Investigation in Bhima Koregaon Case — Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Not Required for CBI Officers. CBI Investigation Valid Under DSPE Act as Section 6A Struck Down by Supreme Court.

5 Dec 2018

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by individuals (Anant Pandurang Kale, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Naveen Kumar Rai and Siraj Razzak Bagwan, Pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Teacher in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Alleged Bribe Demand for Passing Students Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Demand Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

11 Jun 2018

The appellant, Namdeo Bakaramji Pagare, a teacher at a government school in Wardha, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corrupt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

23 Aug 2017

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Sub-Inspector and Another in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and demand of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Aug 2017

The appellants, Rajendraprasad Pande (a Police Sub-Inspector) and Vijay Choube, were convicted by the Special Judge, Bhandara under the Prevention of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Auditor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and voluntary acceptance of illegal gratification.

18 Aug 2017

The appellant, Jagdish Dhanurdhar Kalbage, an Auditor by profession, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case 1/1999 for offences pu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

16 Aug 2017

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

10 Aug 2017

The appellant, Gajanan s/o Lobhaji Dahale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against District Judge for Condoning Delay in Civil Appeal — Judicial Order Not Criminal Misconduct Under Prevention of Corruption Act. The court held that a judicial order condoning delay, even if erroneous, cannot be treated as criminal misconduct under Section 13(1)(d)(iii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and the remedy lies in challenging the order through appropriate legal remedies.

24 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Subhash Sadashiv Risbud, appearing in person, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging an order ...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)