Search Results for "Order XXIII"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Compromise Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioners Failed to Prove Fraud or Misrepresentation. Challenge to Compromise Decree Under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC Dismissed as Not Maintainable and Time-Barred.

The petitioners, Sri Shivarudrappa and Sri S. Somashekar, were defendants No.1 and 3 in O.S.No.24/2011, a suit for partition filed by the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim — Negligence Not a Valid Ground for Repudiation. Theft of vehicle due to driver leaving keys in ignition does not amount to breach of policy conditions; insurer directed to pay 75% of sum assured on non-standard basis.

The appellant, Ashok Kumar, was the owner of a truck (dumper) bearing registration No. HR-55C-5385, insured with New India Assurance Co. Ltd. for an I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Trial Court Order on Impleading Parties in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Upholds Order Allowing Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers as Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, H.P. Subbareddy, filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable properties. During the pendency o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Partition Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Examine Genuineness of Compromise and Consent of Parties, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Suit Without Notice to Intervenors, Sets Aside Order for Costs. The court held that intervenors added as defendants have a right to be heard before withdrawal of suit under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC, and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.

The case involves a civil suit filed by respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) before the City Civil Court, being Long Cause Suit No.2830 of 2002, again...