Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Certificate Cancellation in Thakur Tribe Claim Case — Committee Failed to Consider Valid Documents and Conduct Proper Inquiry. The court set aside the Scrutiny Committee's order cancelling the petitioner's Thakur tribe certificate and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Gajanan Vasudevrao Lade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 06.06.2015 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik Division, Nashik, which cancelled and confiscated his caste certificate issued on 04.12.2004 by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Scarcity No.1, Nashik, certifying him as belonging to the Thakur tribe, a Scheduled Tribe under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950. The petitioner had referred his certificate for verification to the Scrutiny Committee as he intended to contest an election from a ward reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates. The Committee examined his claim but ultimately cancelled the certificate, leading to the present petition. The court found that the Committee failed to consider the documents submitted by the petitioner, including school leaving certificates, revenue records, and other relevant evidence, and did not conduct a proper inquiry as required under the law. The court held that the Committee's order was arbitrary and unsustainable, and quashed the same, directing the Committee to reconsider the petitioner's claim afresh after giving him an opportunity of hearing and considering all relevant documents.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Certificate Verification - Cancellation of Certificate - The Scrutiny Committee cancelled the petitioner's Thakur tribe certificate without properly considering the documents submitted, including school records and revenue entries, and without conducting a thorough inquiry - Held that the Committee's order was arbitrary and unsustainable (Paras 1-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee was justified in cancelling the petitioner's caste certificate on the ground that the petitioner failed to prove his Thakur tribe status

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order dated 06.06.2015, and directed the Scrutiny Committee to reconsider the petitioner's claim afresh after giving him an opportunity of hearing and considering all relevant documents.

Law Points

  • Caste Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents
  • conduct proper inquiry
  • and cannot cancel certificate without valid reasons
  • burden of proof on claimant to establish tribe status
  • principles of natural justice apply
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 49

WRIT PETITION NO. 6336 OF 2015

2018-10-10

A. A. Sayed, K. K. Sonawane

Mr. R. K. Mendadkar a/w. C. K. Bangoji & Ms. Priyanka Shaw for the Petitioner, Ms. Kirti Kulkarni, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4

Gajanan Vasudevrao Lade

State of Maharashtra, Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Nashik, Deputy Collector Nashik, Collector Nashik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of caste certificate by Scrutiny Committee

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 06.06.2015 cancelling his caste certificate

Filing Reason

Petitioner's caste certificate was cancelled by the Scrutiny Committee without proper consideration of documents

Previous Decisions

Scrutiny Committee cancelled the caste certificate on 06.06.2015

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order cancelling the caste certificate was valid and based on proper inquiry

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Committee failed to consider the documents submitted and did not conduct a proper inquiry Respondents argued that the Committee's order was justified

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents and conduct a proper inquiry before cancelling a caste certificate; failure to do so renders the order arbitrary and unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner by taking recourse to the remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court, has preferred the present Writ Petition agitating the validity and propriety of the impugned order passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik Division, Nashik dated 06.06.2015 thereby cancelling and confiscating the Caste Certificate issued in favour of Petitioner by Special Land Acquisition Officer, Scarcity No.1, Nashik bearing Sr. No. MAG/WS/341/2004 dated 04.12.2004.

Procedural History

Petitioner obtained caste certificate on 04.12.2004; referred it to Scrutiny Committee for verification; Committee cancelled it on 06.06.2015; petitioner filed writ petition on 2015; judgment pronounced on 10.10.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of con...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Certificate Cancellation in Thakur Tribe Claim Case — Committee Failed to Consider Valid Documents and Conduct Proper Inquiry. The court set aside the Scrutiny Committee's order cancelling the petitioner's Thakur tri...