Search Results for "Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Quashing of FIR in NDPS Act Case — Ignorance of Gazette Notification Not a Defence. Export of Controlled Substance Without NOC from Narcotics Commissioner Constitutes Prima Facie Offence Under Sections 9A, 25A, 29, 59 of NDPS Act.

The applicant, a director of Vivalavita Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., sought quashing of FIR No. 48 of 2019 registered by the Anti Drug Department, Azad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Accused Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act. Failure to Record Credible Information in Writing Renders Search Illegal, Entitling Accused to Benefit of Doubt.

The petitioner, Mruthyunjaya, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking to quash the entire proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Conscious Possession. Directors of a transport company cannot be held vicariously liable for illegal transportation of poppy straw by driver without proof of knowledge or connivance under NDPS Act.

The petitioners, Sunil Kumar Koushik and Vijay Kochhar, were accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 12/2021-22 registered at Indi Excise Police Station for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Default Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Despite Cognizance. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is Indefeasible and Not Extinguished by Filing of Charge Sheet or Taking of Cognizance Under Section 36A NDPS Act.

The petitioner, Shivaraj Urs, accused No.2 in Special CC No.1197/2019 pending before the Special Judge for NDPS cases, Bengaluru, filed a criminal pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Conscious Possession. Conviction under Section 21(c) read with Section 8(c) and Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession and comply with mandatory safeguards.

The appellant, Gilbert Martin Onuoho, was convicted by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Greater Mumbai, in NDPS Special Case No. 70 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Statutory Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. for Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within Prescribed Period in NDPS Case. The right to default bail accrues upon expiry of 60 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge-sheet before bail application is decided.

The petitioner, Sri Saleem, was arrested on 01.04.2015 in Crime No.144/2015 for offences under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Gangaram s/o Jairam Chaudekar, was convicted under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...