Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

521 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Sales Executive Challenging Termination — Holds He Is Not an 'Employee' Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court affirmed that the petitioner's supervisory and managerial role excluded him from the definition of employee under Section 3(5) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

26 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Mr. Jobi Joseph, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1 April 2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order on Unfair Labour Practices by Mumbai University; Directs Payment of Salary Equivalent to Lowest Grade. Employment of Workers on Casual Basis for Extended Periods Without Permanency Amounts to Unfair Labour Practice Under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

3 May 2019

The judgment pertains to a batch of 18 writ petitions arising from complaints before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Health Department's Petition Challenging Declaration of Unfair Labour Practice Against Temporary Employees. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that denial of permanency to employees who worked for 8-10 years as temporary workers violated Items 5, 6, and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

30 Jan 2020

The petitioners, who are State instrumentalities including the Director of Health Services and other health department officials, filed a writ petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Date of Birth Dispute Resolved in Favour of Workman. The court held that the petitioner-hospital had resorted to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act by not accepting the corrected date of birth of the workman.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and a public trust under the administrative control of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Industrial Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Directing Employer to Pay for Workmen's Defence Advocate. No Statutory Obligation on Employer to Bear Cost of Advocate for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

7 Oct 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Restraint on Termination Without Due Process and Seven Days' Notice for Transfer Upheld. Industrial Court's Order Under MRTU & PULP Act Found Not Perverse or Jurisdictionally Erroneous.

30 Jan 2024

The petitioners, The Indian Express (P) Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19 September 2022 passed by the Industrial C...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)