Search Results for "Limitation Act inapplicable"

481 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Delayed Notice Beyond 30 Days Under Section 138 NI Act. Notice Posted on 31st Day from Bank Intimation Fails to Meet Mandatory Requirement of 'Giving Notice' Within 30 Days.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shivnath Suryoba Gaonkar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010102062008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010085932008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple to Ramachandrapura Mutt. The Court Examines Validity of Revenue Department's Order Under Bombay Public Trust Act and Constitutional Provisions.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions and writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, including Writ Petition No.30609...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010480352008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration to Ramachandrapura Mutt. Petitioners Allege Violation of Rights as Registered Trust and Seek Restoration of Previous Board of Trustees Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.

Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging Government Order No. KAM.E.56 MU.A.B. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Attachment and Proposed Sale of Residential Bungalow under Income Tax Act, 1961, on Ground of Limitation. Petitioner Contends That Tax Recovery Officer's Action Is Time-Barred Under Rule 68B of Second Schedule.

The petitioner, a 60-year-old Indian citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash and set aside the ...