Search Results for "Legal Malafides"

398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion to Law Officer Post in Municipal Corporation — Petitioner Not Entitled to Promotion as Appointment Was by Direct Recruitment and Petitioner Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria.

The petitioner, Sanghmitra R. Sandansing, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to promote her to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Directing Confirmation of Auction Sale Under Punjab Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Act, 1976. High Court's Intervention Justified as Financial Commissioner's Order Based on Conjectures Without Material Evidence Under Rule 8 of the Rules 1976.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 13 August 2008, which set aside an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Section 41-A Notice Issued in Uttar Pradesh Fake News FIR; Twitter India Employee Contends No Control Over Platform and No Cause of Action in Karnataka.

The petitioner, Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Limited (TCIPL), holding the designation of Managing Director b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Transfer Order of Government Officer in Town Planning Department — Upholds State's Power of Transfer as an Incident of Service. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Not Vitiated by Malafides or Violation of Statutory Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende, was serving as Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Pune. He was transferred to the post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Municipal Employees for Violation of Natural Justice. Appointments Made by Competent Authority Cannot Be Set Aside Without Hearing Employees Under Section 308 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act.

The petitioners, four individuals, were appointed by the Municipal Council, Chandur Bazar to posts of Coolie, Chowkidar, and Chaprasi (Peon) after a s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement and Seeking Promotion in Municipal Service — Petitioner Failed to Establish Legal Right to Promotion and Compulsory Retirement Was Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Service Rules.

The petitioner, Choudhari Mohd. Abdul Kadar, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in the Udgir Municipal Council on 13 January 1970. He alleged that in 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Stay on Transfer Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Transfer of Workmen During Pendency of Industrial Disputes Constitutes Prima Facie Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an interim order dated 23rd December 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order for Full Back Wages and Retrenchment Compensation to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Company's Claim of Financial Difficulty and Closure Not Sufficient to Deny Workmen's Entitlement Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, D.G.P.Windsor (India) Ltd., challenged an order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Complaint (ULP) No....