Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Unilateral Registration of Revocation of General Power of Attorney. Registration of a deed of revocation of GPA by the Sub-Registrar without notice to the original holder is illegal and arbitrary, and the court declared it null and void.

The petitioner, North Roof Ventures Private Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

OSA. No. 16 of 2023

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Madras arose out of a construction contract dispute between Tamil Nadu Housing Board (the employer) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Owner's Failure to Produce Driving License. Burden of Proof on Insurer to Show License Invalidity Under Section 149 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Parvati, who died in a road accident on 04.08.2012. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Wife's Petition to Refer Nullity Proceedings to Mediation in Hindu Marriage Act Case — Emphasizes Mandatory Mediation Referral Under Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Section 89 CPC.

The petitioner, Bhavana Ramaprasad, wife of Yadunandan Parthasarathy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...