Search Results for "Intellectual Property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Intellectual Property"

285 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 285 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5000'. The court held that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND' were infringed by the Defendants' use of 'COX 5000', and the Defendants were restrained from using the impugned mark.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, Jagpin Brewerise Limited & Ors., fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving 'Ankur' Mark — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Passing Off and Likelihood of Confusion. The court held that the defendants' use of the identical mark 'Ankur' for identical goods constitutes infringement and passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Nov 2025

The plaintiff, Innovations Garment Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Bhavesh Ramjibhai Gada a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

15 May 2025

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

19 Sep 2022

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by USV Pvt Ltd in Disparagement Cases, Upholds Injunction Against Comparative Advertising. The court held that disparaging a rival's product by implying it contains harmful ingredients without scientific basis constitutes unfair trade practice under Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

13 Jul 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by USV Private Limited (USVPL) against a common order dated 16th June 2022 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — KYK Mark and Trade Dress Protected. Leave under Clause XIV of Letters Patent granted to combine causes of action for infringement and passing off.

28 Jan 2020

The plaintiffs, Mohtimbas Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1, an Indian stockist and distributor) and a Taiwanese manufacturer (Plaintiff No.2), fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Patent in Annuity Payment Dispute — Petitioner's Failure to Pay Annuities Due to Bona Fide Mistake and Lack of Proper Communication from Patent Office. Court held that the Patent Office must give notice before treating a patent as ceased and that the petitioner's application for restoration should be considered on merits under Section 60 of the Patents Act, 1970.

10 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Teijin Limited, a Japanese corporation, was the grantee of Patent No. 207883 in India. The patent was granted on 24th October 2003. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Trade Mark Hearing. Registrar directed to fix hearing for 'CMA' mark application under Trade Marks Act, 1999 as examination report was not communicated.

1 Mar 2013

The petitioner, The Institute of Cost Accountants of India, a body corporate under the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959, filed a writ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Order in Trademark Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction of Single Judge. The original writ petition challenging IPAB order under Trade Marks Act, 1999 was heard by a Single Judge, but as per Rule 636 of Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980, such matters must be heard by a Division Bench, rendering the order without jurisdiction.

29 Oct 2012

The petitioners, original respondent nos.2 and 3, filed a Review Petition against an order dated 29th April 2011 passed by a Single Judge in Writ Peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund of Service Tax Paid in Anticipation of Import of Services — Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 Mandates Interest from Date of Refund Claim. Petitioner deposited service tax but did not receive RBI permission for remittance; refund claim filed on 27 April 2006; Deputy Commissioner disallowed interest; High Court held interest payable from date of refund claim under Section 11BB.

6 Jun 2011

The Petitioner, Shroff United Chemicals Limited, deposited Rs.1.02 Crores as service tax on 31 March 2006 in anticipation of importing intellectual pr...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)