Search Results for "Infrastructure Project"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Infrastructure Project"

783 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 783 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Non-Compliance with Procedural Requirements. Notice Issued Beyond Four-Year Limit Without Proper Sanction and Without Disclosing Reasons for Alleged Income Escaping Assessment.

16 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Chennai Container Terminal Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice dated 26 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 15215 OF 2025

20 May 2025

...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Lack of Privity of Contract. Operational Debt Claim Under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 Fails as No Direct Contractual Relationship Exists Between Appellant and Respondent.

25 Sep 2024

The present appeal was filed by Rahee Jhajharia E to E JV (the Appellant) under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Tender Dispute, Quashing High Court's Order and Permitting Project Completion. The Court held that judicial review in tender matters is limited to examining legality under Article 14 of the Constitution, and interference is unwarranted unless the decision is manifestly arbitrary, unjust, or mala fide, as per Tata Cellular v. Union of India.

21 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a tender process initiated by the Road Construction Department of Jharkhand for the reconstruction of Nagaruntari–Dhurki–Am...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Planning Authority in Fee Revision Dispute — Revised Charges for Infrastructure and Premium FSI Upheld. The Court held that liability to pay charges arises at the time of grant of planning permission, not at the date of application, and authority can revise demands based on revised rates prevailing on the date of permission.

29 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and Prestige Estates Project Ltd. regarding the revision of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Restrain Bank Guarantees in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that invocation of bank guarantees cannot be injuncted except in cases of fraud or irretrievable injustice, and no such case was made out.

2 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim reli...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition by Concessionaire Challenging NOC for Access to Retail Outlet on BOT Highway. Key Legal Question is Whether Concessionaire’s Statutory and Contractual Rights to Control Access Override Highway Administration’s Power to Grant Access Permissions Under Section 8A of National Highways Act, 1956.

24 Oct 2017

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Nandi Highway Developers Ltd (the concessionaire) challenging a no-objection certificate (NOC) dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Infrastructure Dispute Over Concession Agreement — State's Objection on Limitation Rejected as Arbitrability Question for Tribunal. The court held that the issue of limitation is a matter for the arbitrator to decide under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a BOT project.

19 Sep 2017

The applicant, Kakade Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appoin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.

10 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Joint Venture Challenging Disqualification in Metro Rail Tender — Holds That Experience Criteria Must Be Interpreted Reasonably and Cumulatively for Joint Ventures. The court quashed the disqualification of M/s GYTTPL Joint Venture by Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited for not meeting clause 4.2(a) experience criteria individually, directing consideration of combined experience.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, M/s GYTTPL Joint Venture, a joint venture between a Chinese state-owned enterprise and TATA Projects Limited, submitted a tender for t...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)