Search Results for "Forest Development Tax"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Passes Common Order in Petitions Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Seeking Quashing of Proceedings for Offences Under MMRD Act, KMMC Rules and IPC. Multiple Petitions Heard Together on Common Question of Law Regarding Concurrent Prosecution.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench delivered a common order on 6th February 2019, disposing of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Offences Under MMDR Act and IPC. Prosecution Under MMDR Act Requires Complaint by Authorized Officer; Police FIR Without Authority is Illegal.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Twelve Criminal Petitions Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Seeking Quashing of Mining Offence Proceedings. Petitions Sought to Quash Proceedings Under Sections 379, 511 IPC and Various Provisions of MMRD Act and KMMC Rules, Raising Common Question of Law.

Twelve criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Quashing Petitions in Illegal Sand Mining Cases. Common Legal Issue Involves Registration of Offences Under Both MMRD Act and IPC.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Disposes of Criminal Petitions Seeking Quashing of Proceedings Under Mines and Minerals Act. The Petitions Challenged Registration of Cases Under IPC and MMRD Act, 1957, Claiming Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Section 22.

The High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench, presided by Justice H.P. Sandesh, heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Petitions to Quash Criminal Proceedings under MMRD Act and IPC. Common Legal Question Addressed Regarding Maintainability of Prosecution under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard a batch of petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking the qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes MMDR Act Proceedings Initiated by Police in Multiple Petitions; Police Not Authorized Under Section 22 of MMDR Act. Cognizance of Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Cannot Be Taken on Police Report—Only Authorized Persons Can File Complaint.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Despite Alleged Unauthorized Construction in Heritage Precinct.

The petitioners, Raul Aires Fernandes and John Aires Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 30 March 2016 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Water Cess Levy on Industrial Groundwater Use. Levy under Section 12 of Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 is compensatory and regulatory, not a tax, and validly imposed on industries drawing groundwater for commercial purposes.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by industrial companies—BILT Graphic Paper Products Ltd., UltraTech CemCo Ltd., and Associated Ceme...