Search Results for "Employees' Compensation Act, 1923"

243 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Shipping Corporation in Workmen's Compensation Case — Diabetes Mellitus Held as Employment Injury. Commissioner's award of Rs.3,40,000/- to Chief Cook upheld as disease arising out of and in course of employment under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves an appeal by the Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. against an order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarding Rs.3,40...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010371442012_1

The judgment pertains to an appeal by an insurance company against a compensation award and a cross-objection by claimants seeking enhancement. The de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death of Driver in Road Accident Held to Arise Out of and in Course of Employment. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Lack of Written Contract, and Commissioner's Dismissal Set Aside.

The appellant, Smt. Puttamma, mother of deceased Prakash, filed a claim petition before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation (the Tribunal) see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence and Income Assessment Error. Claimant's contributory negligence fixed at 50% and income reduced from Rs.9,000 to Rs.6,000 per month under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the original claimant, Krishnamurari Ramsevak Mahanto, who sustained severe injuries due...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence on Income and Disability. ESI Contribution of Rs.122 per month Held as Relevant Proof of Employment and Income Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant-claimant, Balakrishna, filed an appeal under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 17.02...