High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Involving Tax Authorities and Investigation Agencies. The Court Found No Ground for Intervention in the Petition Challenging Actions of Income Tax and Sales Tax Authorities.
24 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Economic Offences Wing"
180 result(s) found
Found 180 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.
12 Apr 2024The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Failure to File Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 21(4) of NIA Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) CrPC mandates release on bail if investigation not completed within statutory period.
19 Dec 2023The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, was arrested on 14.04.2020 in connection with FIR No. RC 01/2020/NIA/Mum registered by the National Investigating A...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).
28 Apr 2021The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Finance Minister in INX Media Corruption Case — Held That Apprehension of Influencing Witnesses Without Material Cannot Deny Bail
22 Oct 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by P. Chidambaram against the Delhi High Court's order denying him regular bail in the INX Media corruptio...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Activist in Elgar Parishad Case for Lack of Incriminating Material — Mere Presence at Event Insufficient to Attract Sections 153A, 505(1)(b), 117 IPC. Petitioner's Right to Freedom of Speech and Assembly Upheld as No Specific Overt Act Alleged.
13 Sep 2019The petitioner, Gautam P. Navlakha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proce...
- 100
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Dispute — Application Under Section 7 Held Barred by Limitation. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Does Not Extend Limitation for Initiating CIRP Under IBC.
9 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Babulal Vardharji Gurjar, a director of Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., against the order of...
- 215
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Application for Perjury Proceedings Against Respondents in Writ Petition for Filing False Affidavits. Court holds that filing false affidavits amounts to contempt and perjury, and the court can initiate proceedings under Section 340 CrPC without hearing the accused at the preliminary stage.
22 Dec 2018The judgment pertains to a Civil Application filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by the appli...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Government Officer in Multiple FIRs for Alleged Offences Under SC/ST Act and IPC — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Absence of Prima Facie Case. The court held that the acts were in discharge of official duty and sanction was mandatory, and the allegations under the SC/ST Act did not constitute a prima facie case.
10 Dec 2018The petitioner, Mukesh Krishna Bhoge, a government servant working as a Probationary Deputy Collector and Tahsildar at Mukhed, was involved in multipl...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.
24 Dec 2013The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...
- 57
