Search Results for "Correction"

141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Correction of Clerical Error in Cause Title of Previous Judgment. Application for Name Rectification Granted to Correct Respondent's Name from 'KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION COMMISSION & ORS.' to 'KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.' in Civil Appeal No. 4846 of 2021.

The Supreme Court of India heard a miscellaneous application seeking correction of a clerical error in the cause title of a previous judgment. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Police Promotion Case Under Punjab Police Rules, 1934. Inspector General's Approval is Mandatory for Finalizing Promotion List Under Rule 13.7(14), and Promotion Under 10% Quota Requires State-Level Comparative Merit Assessment Under Rule 13.7(9).

The dispute arose from a civil appeal filed by a constable in the Haryana Police against the denial of retrospective promotion to the post of Head Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Civil Appeal Against High Court's Interference Under Article 227 Constitution of India - High Court's order setting aside trial court's decision to set aside ex parte decree was quashed as unjustified interference in discretionary order under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The dispute arose from a civil suit for recovery of money filed by the respondent against the appellant. The appellant contested the suit, but during ...