Search Results for "Contractual Appointment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Contractual Appointment"

658 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses SAI's Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding Tribunal's Direction to Consider Respondents as Initial Constituents Under 2022 Recruitment Rules. Concession Made by Counsel Before High Court Cannot Be Resiled From Absent Fraud or Lack of Authority.

4 Mar 2025

The case involves Sports Authority of India (SAI) and its contractual physiotherapists. SAI was created in 1984 under the Societies Registration Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Dispute Over Encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee After Full Contractual Performance. Arbitration Clause Covers Dispute Despite Completion of Contract and Payment.

19 May 2023

The petitioner, M/S Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Software Implementation Dispute. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked due to respondent's failure to appoint arbitrator under agreement dated 30 October 2015.

30 Nov 2018

The applicant, SAP India Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Lower Division Clerks Seeking Equal Pay for Equal Work. Petitioners, Regularized Ad Hoc Employees, Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Direct Recruits Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

9 Jun 2017

The petitioners, nine Lower Division Clerks working in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Lower Division Clerks in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Challenging Denial of Annual Increment. Held that increment earned for service rendered in preceding year cannot be denied merely because employee proceeded on leave without allowance or was on probation.

9 Jun 2017

The petitioners, nine Lower Division Clerks working in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the denial ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application to Appoint Arbitrator in BPCL Contract Dispute — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act. The court held that an arbitration clause giving one party the sole right to appoint an arbitrator is invalid under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed an independent arbitrator.

26 May 2017

The applicant, DBM Geotechnics & Constructions Pvt Ltd (DBM), filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)