Search Results for "Constructive possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Constructive possession"

405 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 405 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action Against All Defendants Including Those Alleged to Be Benami. The court held that allegations of sham and benami transactions in a suit for specific performance constitute a cause of action and cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

19 Jun 2021

The Appellants, original Plaintiffs, filed Suit No. 187 of 1993 seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st August 1985 in respect ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Allows Writ Petition, Setting Aside Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit. Plaintiff Entitled to Fixed Court Fee Under Section 35(2) as Joint Possession Presumed Unless Ouster Proved.

17 Jul 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, by its single judge, entertained a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition on Police Assistance for Injunction Implementation — Trial Court's Direction Under Section 151 CPC Challenged for Res Judicata and Possession Violations

23 Jul 2026

The writ petition arose from a civil suit (O.S. No. 1708/2024) filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the petitioners-defendants seeking a declarat...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Reference to Mamlatdar for Tenancy Determination in Land Dispute. The court held that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to decide tenancy issues and must refer them to the Mamlatdar under Section 58 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964.

14 Oct 2011

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/02/2000 passed in Special Civil Suit No.108/1979, whereby the learned Judge ordere...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Authority's Order Recognizing Right of Way Over Agricultural Land. Court upholds Deputy Collector's finding that an approach road existed since 1974 consolidation and was mentioned in sale deeds, confirming easement by necessity under Section 13 of the Easements Act, 1882.

2 Jul 2020

The petitioner, Ashok Devman Gangurde, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

25 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Declaring Property as Wakf — Madatmash Inam Grant Treated as Wakf Under Hyderabad Inam Abolition Act. The court held that a Madatmash grant for mosque services is wakf by user, and upon abolition, occupancy rights were conferred on the tenant, not the Inamdar, under the Hyderabad Inam and Cash Grants Abolition Act, 1954.

20 Jul 2016

The case involves a civil revision application filed by four applicants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment and order of the Wakf Tribunal, Aur...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. The Court held that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC if it discloses a cause of action, even if the claim may be weak or unlikely to succeed.

31 Aug 2021

The present Civil Revision Petition was filed by the defendant No.4 in O.S.No.238/2017, a suit for declaration and perpetual injunction instituted by ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title, Defendant's Adverse Possession Not Established. Court sets aside concurrent findings, holding that burden of proof on plaintiff to prove title was not discharged, and defendant's claim of adverse possession was not proved.

18 Dec 2025

The appellant, Yallappa, was the defendant in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondent, Tangamma, in O.S. No. 19/2012 before the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.

27 Oct 2016

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)