Search Results for "Composite Negligence"

201 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 201 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Deceased Student with Future Prospects. Notional Income of Rs. 15,000 per annum with 40% addition for future prospects and multiplier of 18 applied under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sau. Suman Raghunath Wagh, filed a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award of the Motor A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Claim. Tribunal's Award of Rs. 85,000 Enhanced to Rs. 2,00,000 Considering Medical Expenses, Pain, and Loss of Amenities Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rameshbhai Jesingbhai Talpada, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Gujarat against the judgment and award dated 17.12.2014 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Default Due to Counsel's Negligence. Negligence of Advocate Constitutes Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 and Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

The petitioners, legal representatives of Sardar Himmatbhai Khokar, filed a Regular Civil Suit No.794 of 2002 seeking cancellation of a sale deed date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Upholds Compensation for Deaths of Jeep Occupants. Insurer's Defense of Breach of Policy Conditions Fails as No Evidence of Willful Violation or Vehicle Use Beyond Permitted Purpose Was Established.

The New India Assurance Company Limited filed four First Appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging separate judgments of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Pillion Rider in Motor Accident Claim. Multiplier of 18 applied with 40% future prospects, and compensation for pain and suffering increased to Rs.50,000/- under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Jayendrasinh Prabhatsinh Devdhara, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Award Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month and Future Prospects Added at 40% Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenging the judgment and award da...