Search Results for "Calcutta scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Calcutta scheme"

948 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 948 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

26 Oct 2018

The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Wife’s Challenge to 50% Family Pension Order; Upholds Equal Shares for Both Widows Under Rule 75(7)(i)(a) of Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. Second Wife’s Claim Recognized Despite Void Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Based on Service Rule Mandating Equal Distribution Among Multiple Widows.

20 Dec 2023

The dispute pertained to the entitlement of family pension following the death of a railway employee who had married twice. The employee, R. Ramesh Ba...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Section 44C Interpretation Matter, Upholds Assessee's Claim for Full Deduction of Exclusive Expenses. Exclusive Expenditure Incurred by Head Office Solely for Indian Branches Not Governed by Section 44C Limitation, Fully Allowable Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

2 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prohibitory Order Against Contractor in EPF Recovery Proceedings — Third Party Debtor Cannot Be Restrained Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 8G of EPF Act. The court held that a prohibitory order under Section 8G of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires prior determination of the debt owed by the third party to the employer, and cannot be issued solely on the basis of a recovery certificate against the employer.

18 Nov 2025

The petitioner, B.T. Kadlag Constructions, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Court Deposits by Former Employee Despite Appellant's CIRP — Section 14 IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Withdrawal of Pre-CIRP Deposits Made by Corporate Debtor. The court held that the deposit made by the corporate debtor as a condition for stay of execution is not an asset of the corporate debtor and is not covered by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

4 Jan 2023

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Rajendra Prasad Bansal (respondent in the First Appeal) seeking withdrawal of monies deposited by th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

30 Nov 2022

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment to Son Born from Second Marriage Despite Invalidity Under Hindu Marriage Act. Section 16 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Deems Child Legitimate, Entitling Him to Compassionate Appointment.

21 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Yuvraj Dajee Khadake, sought compassionate appointment after his father, an employee of the Central Railway, died in harness on 12 Aug...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)