Search Results for "Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"

400 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 400 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Development of Land Reserved for Garden in Development Plan. Held that reservation for garden does not automatically lapse upon non-development within 10 years; however, failure to acquire land within reasonable time renders reservation invalid and owner entitled to compensation or release.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioners, Runwal Township Pvt. Ltd. and its director Kishorkumar Jain, owned land in Mumbai that was reserved for a garden in the Development P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Demolition of Structurally Sound Building, Sets Aside Unsafe Declaration and Directs Structural Audit by Approved Agency. MCGM's failure to follow guidelines in MCGM v State of Maharashtra and to provide notice to the society before demolition violated principles of natural justice.

12 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Andheri Purab Paschim Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., challenged the action of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

3 May 2023

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Allowing Tenant to Remove Wall in Dilapidated Building Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The High Court Erred in Exercising Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution to Adjudicate Disputed Technical Reports on Building Safety, Overriding Municipal Authority Decisions.

20 Jul 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 24.11.2020, which disposed of a writ petition filed by a tenant (Respondent No.1) agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Held That Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy. The court ruled that revenue authorities cannot decide title disputes and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for such matters.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Mr. Ashok Bansidhar Agarwal and M/s. Rajeshwar Land Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal Against High Court's Directions to Allot Stalls to Unauthorized Occupiers. Held that Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 empowers removal without notice of structures erected contrary to Section 312, and the High Court erred in granting relief to writ petitioners who had no legal right to occupy public land.

1 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against a Bombay High Court judgment that allowed writ petitions filed by six...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Amenity Space Computation by Adjusting DP Road Area in Development Proposal. The court held that the area reserved for Development Plan roads, being a public amenity, can be adjusted towards the amenity space required under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and Development Control Regulations.

29 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Runwal Homes Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Subodh Runwal, owned a plot of land in Nahur, Bhandup (West), Mumbai, which was affected by Developmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that IOD does not confer immunity from action for illegal construction beyond sanctioned plans under MRTP Act, 1966.

13 Apr 2005

The appellant, Parvez M. Yusuf, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai under Section 53(1) of the Mah...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition of Tenanted Premises Without Notice. Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Due Process Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Before Demolishing Structures Occupied by Tenants.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Mrs. Lilly P. Pandit, Mr. Ivan D'Souza, and Mr. Abbas Masalawala, are tenants residing in rooms on the ground floor of 30 Mistry Buil...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)