Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jan 2026...
Search Results for "Bharat Infrastructure"
339 result(s) found
Found 339 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Execution of Foreign Decrees by Mauritius-Based Companies Against Indian Debtors Under Section 44A CPC. The court held that decrees from reciprocating territories are directly executable in India without a fresh suit, and the Commercial Division has jurisdiction over such applications.
26 Apr 2018The judgment involves three execution applications filed by foreign decree holders (Global Asia Venture Company, Matrix Partners India Investment Hold...
- 255
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Technical Bid in Tender Process. Court upholds Panvel Municipal Corporation's decision to reject bid for non-fulfillment of eligibility criteria regarding prior experience in solid waste processing.
24 Apr 2024The case involves a Writ Petition filed by Global Waste Management Cell Pvt. Ltd. and its director Pramod Mishra under Article 226 of the Constitution...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.
2 Apr 2019The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...
- 223
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Challenge to MHADA Acquisition of Cessed Buildings for Redevelopment. Tenants Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition and Tender Process Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.
10 Oct 2023The petitioners, tenants of Dattatraya Buildings in Mumbai, filed writ petitions challenging the acquisition of the buildings by the Maharashtra Housi...
- 72
High Court
Full Bench of the Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Interpretation of Clauses 96 and 97 of MCGM General Conditions of Contract. The Court Examines Whether Compliance with Clause 96 is a Precondition for Invoking Arbitration under Clause 97.
8 Feb 2017The appeal arose from an arbitration petition concerning a contractual dispute between a contractor and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Slum Rehabilitation Authority Against Interim Orders Directing Acceptance of Rehabilitation Proposals. Court upholds trial court's discretion to grant interim relief pending suit, finding no jurisdictional error or perversity in the impugned orders.
13 Sep 2013The Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) and another defendant filed multiple appeals challenging interim orders passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Smart Classrooms — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. Government Order dated 5.7.2016 quashed as it was passed without hearing the successful bidder and without valid reasons.
11 Sep 2019The petitioner, M/s Siddharth Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Governme...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Scope of Section 34 Arbitration Act in National Highways Acquisition Disputes - The court considered whether modification of arbitral awards is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly for compensation awards under the National Highways Act, 1956.
20 Jul 2021The Supreme Court addressed a significant legal question regarding the scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...
- 440
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members — No Agreement of Sale Established, Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove any valid agreement for sale of flats, and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
10 Nov 2014The plaintiff, Vardhaman Developers Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of flats in a cooperative hou...
- 142
