Search Results for "Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976"

309 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 309 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.

The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows PIL Challenging BDA's Deletion of Civic Amenity Land in Canara Bank Colony. BDA's Approval of Amended Layout Plan Reducing 16,000 Sq Ft Civic Amenity Site Quashed for Violating Statutory Requirements Under BDA Act and Zonal Regulations.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by the Canara Bank Colony Residents' Welfare Association under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...