Search Results for "Arbitrary Removal"

934 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 934 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition No.4228 of 2025. The petition is filed by 28 individuals, likely agriculturists, but the specific relief sought and the underlying dispute are not detailed in the provided excerpt.

The matter is a writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioners, numbering 28, are individuals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Stays Tender Process for DPD Transport Solution — Transporters' Association and Importer Challenge Monopolistic Selection. Interim Order Prevents JNPT from Proceeding with Tender for Selection of Five Transporters, Protecting Existing Rights Pending Final Hearing.

The dispute arose from a tender notice dated 23 March 2017 issued by the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (Respondent No. 2) for selection of transporters ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Line Over Private Land, Upholds Validity of Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003. The Court Held That the Provisions for Laying Electricity Lines Without Prior Consent Are Constitutional as They Provide for Hearing and Compensation.

The petitioners, Jarnail Singh and Surinder Singh, are owners of land in Nagpur over which respondent No.1, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...