Search Results for "section 376"

1874 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1874 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Director in Corporate Dispute — Criminal Proceedings Quashed Due to Civil Nature of Transaction. Failure to Repay Loan or Breach of Contract Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 IPC When No Criminal Intent is Established.

The petitioner, Capt. Percy Meher Master, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the rejection of his discharge application in Regular Criminal Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against In-laws in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. The court held that general and omnibus allegations without specific instances of cruelty or demand of dowry do not constitute offences under Sections 498-A, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC.

The present application was filed by the applicants (in-laws of the complainant) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal, Upholds Conviction Under Section 326 IPC for Grievous Hurt Caused by Kanta Blows. Fracture Defined Broadly to Include Any Break, Splintering, or Fissure in Bone, Not Requiring Complete Cut or Displacement.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellants, Hori Lal and Bisram, under Section 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, 387, 201 read with 120B IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances was complete and motive established.

The appellant, Raju @ Doctor Vyankatswami, along with co-accused Somnath, Rufas, Yogesh, and Naresh, was tried for offences under Sections 120-B, 364,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Dismissal of Proceedings Under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. Successive Applications for Legal Heirship Certificate Not Barred by Res Judicata as Proceedings Are Summary in Nature.

The petitioners, Parvatabai and Suresh More, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/06/2018 passed by the 11th Joint Civil Judge Senior D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Vice President — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice of Motion Properly Served and Motion Carried by Majority of Members.

The petitioner, Sri R. Chandrahasa, a member of Kesturu Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Court holds that continuation of proceedings after amicable settlement would be an abuse of process of law under Section 482 CrPC.

The petitioner, Taskin d/o Shaikh Ali Akbar Mogal, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 01440 of 2015 seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2014 registered at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act. Alleged Misappropriation of Seeds and Funds by Public Servants in National Seeds Corporation Leads to Conviction, but Accused Challenges Evidence and Conspiracy Charge.

The appellant, who was accused no. 2, challenged his conviction by the trial court for offences of criminal conspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of t...