Search Results for "prior award"

4062 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4062 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Consortium's Financial Bid in Municipal Water Supply Tender; Court Examines Scope of Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, a consortium of three companies, challenged the decision of the Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation's Standing Committee which disqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Notice Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Co-owners Not Served Individual Notice Before Acquisition for Irrigation Project, Violating Section 4(1) and Section 9(3) of the 1894 Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by three co-owners of agricultural land in Village Nere, Taluka Maval, District Pune, challenging the acquisit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitrator's Interim Order Directing Security in Dredging Contract Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as Arbitrator's Order for Bank Guarantee of Rs. 5,66,30,579/- Upheld Pending Final Award.

The present Commercial Arbitration Petition was filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) by Karanja Terminal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs.55 to Rs.230 per sq. mt. Upheld. Court Relies on Comparable Sale Deeds and Potential Use of Land for Commercial Purposes Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Goa and the acquiring body, Goa Agricultural Produce Market Committee, appealed against the judgment and order dated 24th September 1999 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Court Erred in Rejecting Claim Without Considering Evidence. Enhancement of Compensation Granted Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Luis Alex Cardozo, owned land in Margao, Goa, which was acquired by the respondents (Deputy Collector and Executive Engineer) for the c...