Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2833 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2833 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award — Upholds Award on Claims but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Dispute over supply of car accessories and air conditioning systems leads to arbitration; court finds no patent illegality in award except for interest rate applied.

29 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Jayabharat Automobiles Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay in Arbitration Petition — Delay Beyond 30 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the proviso to Section 34(3) allows extension of only 30 days beyond the three-month period, and an application under Section 33 does not extend limitation.

30 Mar 2016

The applicants, Blue Prime Aluminum Ltd. and others, filed a notice of motion seeking condonation of 24 days delay in filing an arbitration petition u...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Parcel Space Lease Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that claimant failed to prove termination of contract and is not entitled to refund of security deposit.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Prajapati Gunwant Keshavlal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal is a memorandum of appeal, not an application, thus ad valorem fee applies.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an order dated 28.08.2015 passed under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Leave and License Dispute — Petitioner's Breach of Agreement Upheld. Arbitrator's Award of Rs. 90 Lakhs Damages with Interest Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Ropa Plastics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal from order under Section 34 is treated as appeal from decree, requiring ad valorem court fee on subject matter value.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant, Rishabhkumar Jejani, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 28.08.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Due to Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitral tribunal erroneously shifted the burden of proof and failed to follow principles of natural justice, rendering the award liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Aug 2012

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a tribunal constituted un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Under BSE Byelaws — Unconditional Withdrawal and Limitation Bar Second Reference. Held that withdrawal of first reference without liberty to file fresh application and filing beyond six months from last transaction under Byelaw 252(2) renders second reference not maintainable.

8 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd., a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

4 Apr 2024

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Injunction Against Film Release Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Petitioner failed to establish existence of arbitration agreement or any agreement with respondent regarding script/story.

27 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Mr. Prem Mohanlal Girdhani, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking inter...

137 138 139 140 141

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)