Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1691 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1691 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petitions in FERA Prosecution — Exoneration in Adjudication Not a Bar to Criminal Proceedings. Adjudication and criminal prosecution under FERA are independent proceedings with different standards of proof and objectives.

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of orders passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Classification. Classification of dealers based on turnover for LBT exemption is valid under Article 14 as it has a rational nexus with the object of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and M/s. Vidarbha Distillers, are dealers within the meaning of Section 2(16A) of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses SEZ Developer's Petition for Octroi Exemption and Refund. State SEZ Policy Exemption Not Enforceable Against Municipal Corporation Without Statutory Amendment.

The petitioner, EON Kharadi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) developer, sought exemption from octroi and refund of octroi paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 482 Petition Challenging Issuance of Process in Legal Metrology Case Despite Alternate Remedy. Once a petition is admitted and heard on merits, it cannot be dismissed as not maintainable merely because a revision could have been filed.

The applicant, Volvo India Private Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Records of Import of Ground Handling Equipment During Aero India Shows. Petitioners failed to establish any specific instance of smuggling or violation of law, and the petition was found to be based on vague allegations and unsubstantiated claims.

The petitioners, Nishchal Padhya and Arun Goyal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hi...