Search Results for "separate inquiry report"

1599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC set aside as evidence failed to establish intention or knowledge of likely death from a single blow.

The appellant, Ramchandra Yalappa Dhotre, an 80-year-old man, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, on 15-03-2019 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Five Accused in MCOCA Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves five appellants who were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Act, Nagpur, for offences punishable under Sections 302, 143, 147...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 394, 201, 120(B) IPC and Section 135 Gujarat Police Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Parulben Mahendrabhai Godani, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No. 150/2016 for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Appellants for Murder and Kidnapping in Gang-Related Killing. Life imprisonment confirmed for murder under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and kidnapping under Section 364 read with 34 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and witness testimony.

The Appellants, Balvindersingh Balvirsingh Rathod, Diljit Babusingh Labhana, Raina Asaraf Khan, and Bhalchandra Haridas Mahale, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.

The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Pay Export Subsidy to Milk Powder Manufacturer Under Government Resolution Dated 31 July 2018. Court Holds That Entitlement to Subsidy Is Established by Prior Orders and Reports, and Non-Payment Amounts to Arbitrary Action.

The Petitioner, VRS Foods Limited, filed a Writ Petition seeking a direction to the Respondents, the State of Maharashtra and its officers, to pay an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Anticipatory Bail Granted by Kerala High Court in ISRO Espionage Case — Remands for Fresh Consideration. High Court Failed to Consider Individual Roles and Recommendations of Justice D.K. Jain Committee.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the common judgment and order dated 13.08.2021 of the Ke...