Search Results for "prohibition officer"

2453 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2453 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals on Land Acquisition Compensation for Minor Irrigation Tank. Reference Court's Enhanced Market Value Challenged by Both State and Land Losers.

The High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench heard a conglomeration of appeals filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passed Judgment in Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Considered Challenges by State and Landowners Against Reference Court's Compensation Determination for Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank.

The case involves multiple appeals and cross-objections filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.

In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Court Fees in Motor Vehicle Accident Appeals Under Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Claimants Who Are Neither Insurer nor Owner Contend They May Restrict Appeal Valuation and Pay Only Half Ad Valorem Court Fees; Taxing Officer Demands Full Fee on Enhanced Claim Difference.

The dispute arose from office objections requiring deficit court fees from appellants who filed appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Auction Sale: Statutory Violations Render Sale Null and Void. Despite recognizing significant procedural breaches, the Supreme Court offers the appellant a chance to retain the industrial property by settling liabilities.

The legality of an auction sale conducted by the Tahsildar and confirmed by the Additional Collector, which was later contested on the grounds of stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4872 OF 2006

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order Directing Registration of FIR Under Section 175(3) BNSS Against MIDC Employee in Plot Allotment Case — Held That Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind and Not Pass Mechanical Orders Under Section 175(3) BNSS.

The petitioner, Namrata Subhash Pawar, an Assistant in MIDC, challenged the order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dh...