W.P.(MD)No.3096 of 2024
7 Mar 2025The petitioner, M.Sellathambi, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to qu...
Search Results for "estate land"
2310 result(s) found
Found 2310 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Patta in Land Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Prove Better Title than Vendor. Court Upholds Collector's Order That Rights Cannot Exceed Vendor's Defective Title Upheld by Supreme Court, but Directs Protection of Physical Possession if Not Lawfully Taken.
7 Mar 2025The matter arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M. Sellathambi seeking certiorarified mandamus to quash ...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.
11 Jun 2014The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...
- 90
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Collector's Appeal Against High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Partially Taken and Interim Period Excluded, Applying Indore Development Authority Over Pune Municipal Corporation.
24 Feb 2023The dispute involved an appeal against a High Court order that declared land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair C...
- 232
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit, Reinstating Decree for Redemption. Purchaser from Mortgagor Held Necessary Party in Foreclosure Suit Under Order XXXIV Rule 1 CPC, and Right to Redeem Not Extinguished by Decree Against Original Mortgagors Under Section 60 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
17 Aug 2021The dispute arose from a mortgage redemption suit involving land mortgaged in 1954. The plaintiff purchased the mortgaged land via registered sale dee...
- 507
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Inordinate Delay in Granting Permission to Change Land Use from Railway Reservation to Amenities Under DC Regulations. Held that the Corporation's failure to decide the application within a reasonable time amounts to arbitrary exercise of power and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
13 Mar 2014The petitioners, Wadhwa Residency Private Limited and Mr. Manohar M. Chhabria, owned a large plot of land in Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was designated as...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Revision Against Dropping of Charges Against Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan in Adarsh Housing Society Scam. Court holds that sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and its absence vitiates proceedings.
19 Nov 2014The case pertains to the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society scam, where government land admeasuring about 3758 sq.mtrs in Block-VI at Colaba, Mumbai, ...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale of Agricultural Land — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. The plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the courts below correctly dismissed the suit for specific performance.
8 Jun 2016The appellant (original plaintiff) filed a suit for specific performance of a contract of sale of 6 acres of agricultural land (Gat No. 69/A) situated...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reduces Enhanced Compensation from Rs.77,000 to Rs.65,000 per Hectare. Reference Court's enhancement set aside as claimant failed to prove higher market value through comparable sales or potentiality.
8 Jun 2017The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) appealed against the judgment and order dated 06.02.2006 passed by the Reference Court at Ak...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows MIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimant failed to lead any evidence to justify higher compensation; Reference Court's enhancement from Rs.80,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per hectare held unjustified under Section 32(2) of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961.
8 Jun 2017The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court at Akola which enhanced the compensatio...
- 21
