Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

4012 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4012 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Conspiracy — Appeals Arise from Same Sessions Case. Court Reviews Circumstantial Evidence of Motive, Recovery, and Defence of Robbery in Challenge to Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 120B(1), and 498A.

The appeals arose from Sessions Case No.29 of 2014 before the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Nashik, where two accused were tried for the murder of Priy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Rape in Circumstantial Evidence Case — Chain of Circumstances Complete and Inconsistent with Innocence of Accused. Last Seen, Motive, Recovery of Stolen Articles, and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 376, 449, 394 IPC.

The appellant, Mohamed Sameer Khan, was convicted by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court for Bomb Blast Case, Coimbatore, on 17.11.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Accused's Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with Section 34 IPC Rejected as Chain of Circumstances Establishes Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

Two criminal appeals were filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the conviction and sentence recorded by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Establish Motive in Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC. Circumstantial Evidence Incomplete; Court Stresses Need for Chain Excluding Innocence and Proper Opportunity Under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

The criminal appeal arose from a conviction for patricide. The appellant, Surdas Balkrishna Kirgat, was tried and convicted by the Principal Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 and 380 IPC. Appellants’ Conviction and Life Imprisonment Upheld Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Together and Recovery of Stolen Ornaments.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction and sentence for the murder of the informant’s wife an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chandu @ Chandrashekhar Prabhakar Sarode, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Rupali and sentenced to life i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Credible Conspiracy Proof. Conviction Under Sections 302/34 and 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Evidence Excluding All Hypotheses of Innocence.

The appeal arose from a murder case where a recently married woman, Kamla Rani, was shot and killed in 1993 while returning from her parental home on ...