Search Results for "agricultural lands"

2238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Examines Whether Appeal is Barred by Res Judicata and Abatement in Suit for Specific Performance; Court Notes that Plaintiffs Did Not Appeal Decree in Companion Suit and Failed to Bring All Legal Heirs On Record.

The appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2000 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 176 of 1991 and Regular Civil Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order in Land Ceiling Case Due to Unreasonable Delay. The Court Held that suo motu power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within a reasonable time, and an 8-year delay vitiated the proceedings.

The dispute revolved around the exercise of suo motu revisional jurisdiction by the Additional Commissioner under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Land Owners in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Applied Cumulative Rate of Annual Increase and Reduced Development Cut, Determining Market Value Based on Highest Bona Fide Exemplar Sale Deed from 1979.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land measuring 297 Kanals and 1 Marla in Jassi Pau Wali, Bhatinda, Punjab, for establishing the Bhatinda Int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The dispute pertains to a partition suit filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) seeking partition of ancestral property. The appellant, defend...