Search Results for "society management dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "society management dispute"

2040 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2040 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Valuers in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act as Complainant Failed to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act is rebuttable and the complainant must prima facie show a legally enforceable debt.

6 Dec 2017

The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed by Ramesh Dahyalal Shah, Yardi Prabhu Consultants & Valuers Pvt. Ltd., and Ashwinkumar Shet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order on Maintainability of ULP Complaint By Contract Workers. Contract Workers' ULP Complaint Against Principal Employer and Labour Officer Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 Examined for Jurisdiction.

20 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a biennial election of five employee representatives under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 at the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Dismissal of Workmen; Finds Dismissal Valid and No Violation of Natural Justice. The Court upheld concurrent findings of the Labour Court and Industrial Court that no unfair labour practice under Item 1(a) of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act was committed, as dismissal was justified by grave misconduct.

19 Jul 2018

The dispute arose when Peico Electronic & Electrical Co. Ltd., a company manufacturing radios, electronics, and tape recorders, dismissed five of its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Trust in Family Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Oral Trust or Fiduciary Relationship Under Indian Trusts Act, 1882. Court holds that mere family relationship does not create a trust and that suit under Section 92 CPC requires specific allegations of breach of trust.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiff, Sabita Rajesh Narang, filed a suit against her brother Sandeep Gopal Raheja and other family members and companies, seeking a declarati...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.256 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

14 Sep 2021

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

132 133 134 135 136

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)