Search Results for "costs certificates"

2002 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2002 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses DRI's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in DEPB Scheme Case — No Liability for Alleged Overvaluation. Settlement Commission's finding of no fraud or misrepresentation by exporter upheld as finding of fact not open to interference under Article 226.

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 6 March ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Petition Challenging Denial of Admission to Diploma Course Based on Inapplicable Board Communication. HSC with MCVC Stream Held Distinct from General HSC, Board's Communication Not Applicable.

The petitioner, Manish Suresh Umak, a student, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 7/9/2009 from the Maharashtra State Board of Te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 145 CrPC Proceedings in Multi-Party Disputes and Successive Orders. The court held that Section 145 CrPC applies to disputes involving more than two parties and that successive orders are permissible if fresh material shows a new apprehension of breach of peace.

The case involves a group of writ petitions and intervention applications challenging the validity of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Majority Consent and Sanctioned Plans Upheld. Court held that the redevelopment scheme was validly sanctioned and the petitioners' objections were not sufficient to stall the project.

The petitioners, seventeen occupants of residential tenements in Dalal Estate, Mumbai Central, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging IPAB Order Refusing Additional Evidence in Trademark Opposition. Court holds that the IPAB's refusal to allow additional documents was not perverse or arbitrary, and the petitioners failed to show sufficient cause for not producing them earlier.

The petitioners, M/s. Agar Distributors (India) and Shri Siraj Amirali Soorani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 July 2010 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendants' Notice of Motion to Set Aside Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit. Court holds that Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC cannot be used as a review mechanism and that the word 'NATURAL' is descriptive but may acquire distinctiveness through secondary meaning.

The plaintiffs, Siddhant Ice Creams Pvt. Ltd. and two others, filed a suit for trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright infringement against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Admission to B.V.Sc & A.H. Course Despite Lack of Bonafide Certificate. Bonafide Certificate Issued by College Held Sufficient for Admission Consideration Under Clause 8.1(ii) and 8.3.1 of Admission Brochure.

The petitioner, Sonali Khandate, a student who passed the 12th standard Board Examination in 2010-2011 and took admission to B.Sc. 1st year at Ferguss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Non-Resident Company — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion is Impermissible; Notice and Order Rejecting Objections Set Aside.

The petitioner, Indivest Pte Ltd, a company incorporated in Singapore and wholly owned by the Government of Singapore, filed a writ petition challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. NDT Systems, a partnership firm engaged in non-destructive testing business, filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-...