Search Results for "contradictory statement"

1666 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1666 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nathaji Tukaram Lohakare, a Talathi (village revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Intent. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Fatal Injury Not Proved to be Caused by Accused with Requisite Intention.

The appellant, Dilip Bhoja Padalkar, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Sessions Case No. 99/99 for the murder of his wife...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Constable in Attempted Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Unreliable Evidence. State's Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 307, 286 IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Rajmahendrasingh D. Pardeshi, a police constable, who was charged with offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Impleadment of Co-owners in Suit for Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Parties with Direct Interest in Subject Matter to Avoid Multiplicity of Suits.

The petitioners, Sitaram Deorao Pawar and Totaram Deorao Pawar, filed two separate writ petitions challenging an order dated 6/11/2003 passed by the J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Cruelty and Murder Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 498A and 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case...