Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"

2023 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2023 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Cross Appeals Against Temporary Injunction Order in Suit by Co-operative Housing Society. Developer and Land Owner Challenge Order Restraining Construction and Use of FSI in Suit Alleging Breach of Development Obligations.

The dispute arose from a development project known as Dosti Flamingos in Sewri, Mumbai. M/s. Dosti Corporation, a partnership firm, acted as developer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Disciplinary Jurisdiction of Medical Council of India Over Doctors in Maharashtra Medical Council Act Challenge. Court Considers Whether MCI Has Power to Remove Names from State Register and Whether Natural Justice Was Violated.

These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenge orders passed by the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes Cross Appeals from Trial Court's Injunction Order in Suit for Demolition and CRZ Declaration; Construction in CRZ Not Entitled to Completion Certificate Though Demolition Restrained When Built Per Sanctioned Plan.

The dispute arose from a notice dated 7th February 1998 issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Amend Bank Guarantee in Tender Process; No Prejudice Found. Petitioner's Prompt Correction of Mistaken Bank Guarantee Validity and Lack of Prejudice to Respondent Justifies Direction to Consider Amended Guarantee Under Article 226.

This case arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a proprietary concern engaged as a contractor for public ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Maintainability of Motion for Setting Aside Consent Decree Alleging Fraud. Court Interprets Order 23 Rule 3A CPC and Precedent to Determine if Non-Party Can Challenge Consent Decree via Application.

Background: The dispute arose from Suit No. 1188 of 1984 concerning certain properties. Premnath, brother of original plaintiff No. 1, had been recogn...