Search Results for "1894"

1817 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1817 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.

Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Nagpur Bench Delivers Oral Judgment on Challenge to Parole Rule. The Court examined whether the proviso to Rule 19 of the Bombay (Furlough and Parole) Rules 1959, restricting parole to once a year except in death cases, violates Article 21 of the Constitution.

These writ petitions, filed by convicts in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Land Acquisition References from Talsania Family Against SLAO's Valuation for Acquired Andheri Land; Sale Instance of Vazirani Plot and Deductions for Development Under Scrutiny. Interest on Compensation Restricted to 9% Per Annum by Consent in Related Summary Suits.

The case comprised several land acquisition references filed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, seeking enhancement of compensation f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay Considers Challenge to Revised Guidelines for Grant of Offshore Exploration Licence. Petitioner Argues Notification Violates Section 35 of Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002 and Article 14.

The writ petition was filed by Rare(H) Minerals Private Limited, a company engaged in prospecting and exploration, challenging the Notification (Revis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Civil Revision Application Against Land Acquisition Officer's Refusal to Refer Enhancement Compensation Claim. Case Raises Issue Whether Officer Can Reject Reference Under Section 34(1) of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 When Agreement for Negotiated Price Exists.

The case arose from the acquisition of land Gut No. 26, admeasuring 2 H. 10 R, situated at Village Ladgaon, Aurangabad, belonging to the original owne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears First Appeal and Cross-Objections Against Land Acquisition Compensation Award. Court Reviews Reference Court's Enhancement to Rs. 15 per sq. meter and Parties' Contentions on Valuation and Notice.

The appeal and cross-objections arose from a reference court award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State acquired 18,430 sq. meters of land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Landowner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Possession. Court Holds Notice Under Section 9 Related to Earlier 1987 Acquisition, Not 1998 Notification, and Rejects Limitation Plea as Belated.

The case arose from a writ petition filed by Sidhappa Gurupadappa Bijargi, an agriculturist, challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rescuing Accused and Causing Hurt to Customs Officers in Santhal Parganas. Sea Customs Act, 1878 Applicable to Scheduled Area Through Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947, and Inspectors Had Authority to Arrest and Seize Cloves as Prohibited Goods.

The matter arose from an incident on 13 December 1961 at Pakur Railway Station in the Santhal Parganas, Bihar. Nazir Mian, one of the appellants, was ...