Search Results for "additional fee"

1995 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1995 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Amputation Victim in Motor Accident Case — Future Prospects and Pain & Suffering Considered. Claimant's right leg amputated in bus-truck collision; Tribunal's award enhanced from Rs.2,35,060 to Rs.7,38,260 with 9% interest under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Ramilaben Jadavbhai Patel, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — Insurance Company Held Liable Despite No Negligence Proof. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,84,200 to Rs.2,50,000 with 9% Interest.

The appellant, Nizambhai Vallibhai Dosani, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation for Death of Minor in Motor Accident — Notional Income of Rs. 60,000 per Month Applied for 17-Year-Old Student. The court held that a student with good academic record and educated parents could have earned high salary, justifying higher notional income.

The appeal was filed by the United India Insurance Company Ltd against the judgment and award dated 20.03.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Award of Rs.10,66,000 with 9% Interest. Negligence of Driver Established; Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Alleged Breach of Policy Conditions.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 06.01.2012, when the deceased Nazirbhai Mahamadbhai Malek (Garasia) was waiting for a rickshaw ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows PIL Seeking Prevention of Cow Slaughter in Non-Designated Places During Bakrid. Court Holds That Slaughter of Cows and Calves Must Only Occur in Designated Slaughterhouses Under Article 48 of the Constitution and Tamil Nadu Animal Preservation Act.

The petitioner, K. Surya alias K. Surya Prasanth, a resident of Coimbatore and an activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

...