WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025
1 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Reference court enhancement"
1589 result(s) found
Found 1589 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced for Land and Fruit Trees. Land's Potentiality and Income from Trees Considered for Fair Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
3 Jul 2017The appellant, Shriram s/o Namdeo Hoge, owned land Gut No.4, measuring 4 hectares, in Dahigaon, Taluka Chikhali, District Buldhana. The land was acqui...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition for Konkan Railway — Sale Deed of Comparable Land Justifies Higher Rate. Reference Court's reliance on sale deed of paddy field at Rs.30 per sq m held proper for determining market value under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
20 Apr 2005The case pertains to an appeal by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Chief Engineer of Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. against the judgment ...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation for Agricultural Land Acquired by Konkan Railway Corporation. Comparable Award for Adjacent Land Acquired in 1985, Settled at Rs. 75 per sq.m., Applied to Determine Market Value Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
9 Feb 2005The appellant, Smt. Janaki N. Morajkar, was a tenant of agricultural land bearing Chalta No. 4/6 of P.T. Sheet No. 271, measuring 2594 sq. metres, bel...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Claimants to Withdraw Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference — Proceedings Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) Proviso of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The court held that deposit of compensation by acquiring authority does not amount to payment, entitling claimants to withdraw the amount subject to an undertaking to repay if reference is decided against them.
21 Feb 2019The petitioners, claimants in land acquisition reference proceedings, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India cha...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowner's Writ Petition Against Bank's Claim Over Land Acquisition Compensation Due to Charge on Acquired Land. Bank's Charge on Land Under Acquisition Made It an Interested Person Eligible to Claim Apportionment of Compensation Under Section 30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
24 Jan 2017The petitioner, Damu Patil, owned agricultural land in Dhule, which was acquired for the Lower Tapi Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and ...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Bank of India's Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Claim of Non-Signatory Status, with Jurisdictional Issue Left to Arbitrator.
3 Nov 2025The judgment arises from a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an a...
- 213
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable for Death of Student. The court affirmed the Tribunal's award of Rs. 4,50,000 with interest, rejecting the Insurance Company's plea of breach of policy conditions and contributory negligence.
21 Aug 2015The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of Rajesh, a 19-year-old student who died in a road accident on 4-5 July 199...
- 136
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation Project. Court Condones Delay and Grants 10% Cumulative Escalation for Potential Development, Denies Interest for Delayed Filing.
30 Jul 2019The Supreme Court partly allowed appeals by claimants seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Hirehalla project. The Government notifi...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Project — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition was for a public purpose and that the petitioners' remedy lay in seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rather than challenging the acquisition itself.
7 Jul 2023The petitioners, owners of land in Village Wagholi, Pune, challenged the acquisition of their land for a road widening project by the State of Maharas...
- 46
