Search Results for "interlocutory"

2060 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2060 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Divorce Decree in Christian Marriage Dissolution Case Under Section 10 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Court upholds Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on grounds of adultery and cruelty, finding no legal infirmity.

The case involves a civil reference under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, where the Principal Judge, Family Court No.2, Pune, passed a dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Landlord's Failure to Cultivate Land Within One Year of Purchase Triggers Tenant's Right to Purchase Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, regarding agricultural land in Survey No. 341, admeasuring 15 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Frame Preliminary Issue in Rent Act Proceedings. Maintainability of Application Under Section 13A(2) of Bombay Rents Act Involves Mixed Questions of Law and Fact and Cannot Be Decided as Preliminary Issue.

The case involves two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 7th October 2004 passed by the competent authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Property Dispute Over Passage and Gate. Trial Court Failed to Consider Leave Application Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Before Granting Interim Relief.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Respondents 1 to 4 (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant No.1) and the Municipal Corporation (defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Air India Challenging Rejection of Approval Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act — Withdrawal of Earlier Application and Reinstatement of Workman Bars Fresh Application for Approval of Dismissal Based on Same Misconduct.

The case involves a challenge by Air India Ltd. (the petitioner) against an order of the Presiding Officer of the National Industrial Tribunal at Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Orders in Testamentary Suit Under Section 268 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Court holds that Section 141 CPC confers power to protect estate property pending grant of letters of administration.

The Plaintiff, Rupali Mehta, filed Petition No.378 of 2005 seeking letters of administration with the Will annexed in respect of the estate of Captain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Possession. Held That Plaintiffs Have Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favors Grant of Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The present appeal arises from an order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji, granting a temporary injunction in favour of the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order to Frame Preliminary Issue in Service Termination Case. Industrial Court's Direction to Decide Applicability of Model Standing Orders vs. MCS Rules as Preliminary Issue Upheld.

The petitioners, employees of respondent No.1, were terminated from service on 14th January 1991 after being convicted under Section 85(1) of the Bomb...