Search Results for "duty paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "duty paid"

7061 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7061 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Octroi on Computer Software in Classification Dispute. Software Held to Be Separate Goods from Hardware Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 and Octroi Rules.

11 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Tata Information Systems Ltd. (now IBM Global Services India Private Limited), was engaged in the manufacture, import, sale, and marke...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Penalty on Directors in Central Excise Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Evidence of Personal Involvement Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

23 Jun 2017

The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence in Gangrape Case: First Conviction Under Section 376E IPC After 2013 Amendment. Trial Court Imposed Capital Punishment for Repeat Offenders in the Shakti Mill Incident, and the High Court Reviewed Procedural Propriety of the Sentence.

25 Nov 2021

The judgment under analysis is a confirmation case arising from the brutal gangrape of a young photo journalist at Shakti Mill premises in Mumbai on 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

23 Nov 2022

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Part, Sets Aside Trial Court's Rejection of Rent Arrears Claim in Eviction Suit. The court held that the claim for arrears of rent from 01.04.2000 to 30.11.2021 was not barred by limitation as the tenancy continued and the suit was filed within three years from termination.

19 Dec 2025

The appellants, Smt. Sarojamma and others, filed a commercial suit (Com.O.S.No.124/2023) before the LXXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant Company's Revision Against Jurisdiction Under PSCC Act. Company Failed to Prove Paid-Up Share Capital Below Rs.1 Crore to Avail Protection Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

7 Jun 2017

The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents 1 to 12) against M/s. New Era Fabrics Ltd., the original de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance. Cross Objection Filed by Defendants Challenges Direction to Repay with Interest.

21 Nov 2015

The matter arose from a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Gold Touch Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate developer, against six respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Right to Search Before Magistrate Leads to Acquittal. The court held that non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, 1985, vitiates the trial and entitles the accused to acquittal.

28 Jun 2023

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by individuals convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Directors' Challenge to Pre-deposit Order in Cenvat Credit Penalty Case — Rule 13(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 Does Not Permit Personal Penalty on Directors. The court set aside the CESTAT order directing pre-deposit of 25% penalty by directors, holding that Rule 13(1) only contemplates penalty on the person availing credit.

19 Jan 2010

The petitioners, Mr. Ashokkumar H. Fulwadhya and Mr. Daulatkumar H. Fulwadhya, directors of M/s. Harisons Steel Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal on Employees' Contribution Deduction in Income Tax Case. Employees' contribution to PF/ESI/pension fund is deductible under Section 36(1)(va) only if paid before due date, not under Section 43B.

14 Oct 2014

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the ...

130 131 132 133 134

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)