Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1557 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1557 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Laytime and Demurrage Clauses. Court holds that Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or correction of errors of law unless award is patently illegal or perverse.

15 Jul 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Puyvast Chartering B.V. (owner) and M/s. Puyvast Maritime India Ltd. (agent), challenged an arbitral award dated 28 February 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Discharge of Railway Official in Fabrication Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Complainant's Private Complaint for Offences Under Sections 193 and 204 IPC Fails as Accused Was a Public Servant Acting in Discharge of Official Duty.

6 Nov 2017

The applicant, Shailesh Kulkarni, was a railway contractor who had disputes with the railway authorities. During arbitration proceedings, a document w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application to Appoint Arbitrator in BPCL Contract Dispute — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act. The court held that an arbitration clause giving one party the sole right to appoint an arbitrator is invalid under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed an independent arbitrator.

26 May 2017

The applicant, DBM Geotechnics & Constructions Pvt Ltd (DBM), filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petitions Challenging Interlocutory Orders Rejecting Applications Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Commercial Suit. Revisions Under Section 115 CPC Barred by Section 8 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Counterclaim Against Co-Defendant Maintainable if It Concerns Plaintiff’s Rights.

25 Nov 2025

The High Court of Karnataka dealt with two civil revision petitions arising out of commercial suits filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) against a borr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Section 9 Petition for Enhanced Bank Guarantee in IPL Franchise Dispute. Court holds that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be used to modify or enhance security already ordered by consent, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any new circumstances warranting additional protection.

24 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Partnership Dispute — Status Quo Ordered on Firm Properties Pending Arbitration. Court records statements from parties not to alienate partnership properties, directing status quo to preserve subject matter of arbitration.

9 Apr 2012

The petitioners, Taz Naval Nariman and Rukhsshana Meher Anklesaria, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application in Out-of-State Contract Dispute. Holds That Arbitration Is Not a 'Thing Done' Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and Contract Executed and Performed Outside Maharashtra Is Not Liable to Stamp Duty in Maharashtra.

22 Nov 2019

The applicant, S Satyanarayana & Co, a partnership firm based in Visakhapatnam, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

13 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute — Arbitration Clause Requires Multiple Arbitrators. The court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitration clause specifying 'arbitrators' in plural and 'one by each party' mandates appointment of multiple arbitrators, not a sole arbitrator.

4 Sep 2013

The case involves an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Mrs. Perin Hoshang Davierwalla and anothe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Replace Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute — Past Legal Representation Does Not Attract Seventh Schedule Ineligibility. Court holds that past representation of affiliates as counsel does not constitute current representation or business relationship under Items 1 and 2 of Seventh Schedule of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Priyanka Communications India Pvt, filed a petition under Sections 12, 13, and 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...

130 131 132 133 134

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)