Search Results for "1894"

1817 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1817 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Nullity Award Against Deceased Claimant and Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs in Land Acquisition Reference. Proceeding Against Dead Person Held Void; Appeal Dismissed as Not Maintainable Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The matter arose from the acquisition of land belonging to Mahadeo Mali under Section 4 notification dated 11.05.2000. He accepted the compensation un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Disposes of Appeals Challenging Apportionment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Awarded Entire Compensation to One Party Without Framing Issues or Properly Evaluating Evidence Under Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard three first appeals against the judgment of the Reference Court dated 15.07.2010, which had awarded the entire c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case; Upholds Enhanced Compensation Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Rejects State's Contentions on Agricultural Land and Tenant Status.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard a first appeal filed by the State against the judgment and award of the Reference Court enhancing land acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Appeal Challenging Reference Court's Compensation Award to Legal Heirs in Land Acquisition Dispute. The Appellate Court Examines Res Judicata Plea from Earlier Eviction Suit and the Applicability of Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

This first appeal arose from a dispute over the apportionment of compensation for an acquired house in Goa. The appellant, Shantabai L. Parkar, claime...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeal Against Decree Declaring Suit Darga as Personal Property. The Wakf Board Appealed the First Appellate Court’s Finding that It Failed to Adduce Evidence of Wakf Declaration under Sections 4 and 5 of the Wakf Act, 1995.

The appeal arose from a suit for injunction filed by the plaintiffs, who along with defendant No.1 claimed joint ownership and management of the suit ...