Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7304 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7304 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement of Sale with Possession and Part Payment Enforced Against Subsequent Purchaser Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 15.7.1987 between the plaintiff (first respondent) and the fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim and Enhances Son's Maintenance in Section 125 CrPC Case — Family Court Erred in Denying Maintenance to Wife Based on Earning Capacity Alone; Son's Maintenance Enhanced from Rs.500 to Rs.1,500 Per Month.

The revision petition was filed by the wife and minor son against the order dated 14.10.2010 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Belgaum in Criminal Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Criminal Contempt Reference Against Accused for Threatening and Scandalizing Metropolitan Magistrate. Persistent Harassment, Intimidation, and Obstructing Judicial Proceedings Prima Facie Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The matter arose from a criminal contempt reference made by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 17th Court, Borivali, Mumbai, under Section 15(2) of the Cont...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Challenging Review Orders on MVAT Refund Adjustments Quashed by Bombay High Court. Bombay High Court invalidates review orders under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act due to lack of jurisdiction, directing refund of Rs. 2.72 crores with interest.

The Bombay High Court quashed review orders issued under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act, 2022 (Settlement Act). The ...