Search Results for "Kerala Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Kerala Act"

4121 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4121 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Validity of Rule 86E of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 in Recovery Proceedings. Court Holds That Rule 86E Is Not Ultra Vires Article 14 as Proceedings Under Section 101 Are Summary and Do Not Require Cross-Examination, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 154 Is Available.

9 Dec 2011

The two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 86E of the Maharas...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of COVID-19 Public Health Infrastructure in Maharashtra. Court Refers to Earlier Principal Seat Judgment Highlighting State's Obligation Under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Disaster Management Act, 2005.

18 Aug 2020

On 26.06.2020, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, registered Suo Moto Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2020 to ad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Challenge to Municipal Council's Language Display in Signboard Case. Use of Urdu Alongside Marathi on Municipal Signboard Held Permissible Under Maharashtra Local Authorities (Official Languages) Act, 2022 as Act Does Not Prohibit Additional Languages and Urdu is Constitutionally Recognized.

15 Apr 2025

The dispute originated from the appellant, a former member of the Municipal Council, Patur, objecting to the display of Urdu language on the Council's...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Lack of Toilet Facility — Petitioner Not a Person Aggrieved Under Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The court held that a person who is not a voter or qualified to be a member of the Gram Panchayat cannot maintain disqualification proceedings.

4 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Waghji Bhivaji Bhalerao, a resident of Gram Panchayat Khandala, filed a disqualification application under Section 14(1)(j-5) of the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

24 Jan 2014

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

24 Jan 2014

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

31 Jan 2019

The appellant, M/s. Ajmera Housing Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, again...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 153A for Assessment Year 2011-12 in Search Case — Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year Limit Invalid. The Court held that the notice under Section 153A for AY 2011-12 was barred by limitation as the search was conducted on 08.10.2020 and the six-year period preceding the assessment year of search (2021-22) would cover AYs 2015-16 to 2020-21, not AY 2011-12.

4 Feb 2026

The petitioner, an individual with agricultural income, rental income, and partnership income from M/s. Popular Developer, was subjected to a search u...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal for Non-Examination of Complainant's Witness. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; trial court erred in acquitting solely due to non-examination of complainant's power of attorney holder.

31 Jan 2019

The appellant, M/s. Ajmera Housing Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 agains...

129 130 131 132 133

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)