Search Results for "Equity Jurisdiction"

2857 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2857 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Removes Interim Application and Treats Guardianship Petition as One under Clause XVII of Letters Patent. Disposal of Interim Application No. 1768 of 2025 on 24 April 2025 Leads to Removal from Board.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, presided over by Justice Abhay Ahuja, took up Guardianship Petition No. 8 of 2025 along with Interim Applicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.

The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiffs' Regular Second Appeal Challenging Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Inam Land. Regrant of Land Under Karnataka Village Office Abolition Act During Pendency of Suit Does Not Prove Antecedent Ownership or Possession.

The case involves a regular second appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...