Search Results for "PW1"

2758 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2758 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Brutal Killing of Mentally Challenged Victim. Life Imprisonment and Fine Affirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including DNA, Recovery of Weapon, and Motive of Insurance Fraud.

The appellant, Janardhan Kokre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, South Goa, for the murder of Dilip Sadashiv Naik, a mentally challenged person, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Maharashtra Prohibition Act Case — Failure to Put CA Report Under Section 313 CrPC Not Fatal. Possession of 48 Bottles of Illicit Liquor Proved Through Recovery and Panch Witnesses, Conviction Under Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act Confirmed.

The applicant, Sau. Shobha Baburo Shende, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagbhid, under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petitions in Eviction Case Based on Bona Fide Need. Appellate Court's reversal of eviction decrees set aside for ignoring settled legal principles regarding landlord's bona fide need under Section 13(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Nilkanthrao Raghunathji Chute, is the landlord of a building known as 'Sai Sadan' in Nagpur, which contains four shops on the ground f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC set aside as injuries were not sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature and no common intention to cause death was established.

The appellants, Waman Shendge and his wife Kantabai, were convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim on 31.8.2006 in Sessions Trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Human Trafficking Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Exploitation. Conviction under Section 370 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was trafficked for exploitation.

The case involves two appeals filed by Salauddin Abdul Wahid Khan and his wife Asma Salauddin Khan against their conviction under Section 370 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Human Trafficking Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Exploitation. Conviction under Section 370 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove inducement or exploitation for forced labour or prostitution.

The appellants, Salauddin Abdul Wahid Khan and his wife Asma Salauddin Khan, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Human Trafficking and Immoral Traffic Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 370(2)(3) IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 set aside as prosecution failed to prove trafficking or brothel-keeping beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anita Jethalal Katariya, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions Case No. 90 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as testimony of prosecutrix failed to inspire confidence.

The case involves two appeals filed by Samundersing Mahipal Sing and Rajnishkumar Sureshchandra Kumar against their conviction by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband and Co-Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302, 498A, and 109 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not reliable.

The case involves an appeal by Sanjay Ramkrushna Bhatkar (appellant No. 1) and Kiran Sukhdev Muley (appellant No. 2) against their conviction by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction Under Section 304A IPC for Rash and Negligent Driving Causing Death — Revision Dismissed. The court confirmed concurrent findings of guilt under Section 304A Indian Penal Code, 1860 for causing death by rash and negligent driving.

The applicant, Popat Bhaginath Kasar, was convicted by the trial court for offences including causing death by rash and negligent driving under Sectio...