Search Results for "suspicious recovery"

452 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 452 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole reliance on extra-judicial confession without independent corroboration found unsafe.

The appellant, Arjun Ishwara Gejage, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of a person on 18th February 2014. The prosecution ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Housebreaking and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 457 and 380 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The petitioner, Thippeswamy @ Kunta Thippaga, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Challakere in C.C.No.898/2010 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.2 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Smt. Gulnaz, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura (sitting at Chintamani) in S.C. No.54/2013...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder and Evidence Disappearance Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death or cruelty beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the death of Babli, wife of Hublal Chikwa, who died in suspicious circumstances at her matrimonial home in Majari colliery, Chand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Robbery Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Section 392 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the accused, Shivaji Haribhau Jirase, by the trial court for an offence under Section 392 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery — State fails to prove guilt under Sections 395 and 397 IPC as witnesses could not identify accused and no stolen property recovered.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16.02.2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur, in Sessions Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by other witnesses.

The case pertains to the murder of Sk.Abid, an auto rickshaw driver, on the night of 8th September 2009. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows SBI Appeal in Demand Draft Fraud Case — Bank Held Negligent for Confirming Non-Encashment Despite Prior Payment. SBI Bangalore's Own Negligence in Issuing Incorrect Confirmation Precludes Recovery from Collecting Bank Under Section 131 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, State Bank of India (SBI), Bangalore branch, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit land.

The appellant, Bajirao Ramchandra Shelar, filed two second appeals (Second Appeal No.494 of 1990 and Second Appeal No.495 of 1990) against the judgmen...